Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ipsilesional neglect: Behavioural and anatomical features

  • M. Kim
  • , D. L. Na
  • , G. M. Kim
  • , J. C. Adair
  • , K. H. Lee
  • , K. M. Heilman
  • University of Florida
  • University of New Mexico
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • VA Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objective - To learn more about the behavioural and anatomical features of ipsilesional neglect. Methods - Thirty consecutive patients with spatial neglect were tested on cancellation and line bisection tasks. To learn if patients with ipsilesional neglect demonstrate the sensory-attentional or motor-intentional type of neglect, a video apparatus was used that dissociates these determinants. Results - Five patients showed evidence of ipsilesional neglect. This phenomenon was seen only on the line bisection task. All patients with ipsilesional neglect had lesions involving frontal-subcortical regions. Although ipsilesional neglect evolved from early in three of five cases the other patients displayed ipsilesional neglect without initial contralateral neglect, suggesting that ipsilesional neglect cannot be fully attributed to a compensatory strategy. The results of the tests that used the video apparatus indicate that right sided frontal or subcortical injury may induce contralateral attentional or intentional 'approach' behaviours. Conclusions - Ipsilesional neglect is most often associated with frontal-subcortical lesions, cannot be entirely attributed to a compensatory strategy, and may be induced by an attentional bias, an intentional bias, or both.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-38
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Keywords

  • Approach
  • Frontal-subcortical
  • Ipsilesional
  • Neglect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ipsilesional neglect: Behavioural and anatomical features'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this