Interobserver reproducibility of PD-L1 biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study by 27 pathologists

Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Assessment of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical staining is used for treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regarding use of PD-L1/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy. The reliability of the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx assay is critical in guiding clinical practice. The Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists investigated the interobserver reproducibility of PD-L1 staining with 22C3 pharmDx in NSCLC samples. Methods: Twenty-seven pathologists individually assessed the tumor proportion score (TPS) for 107 NSCLC samples. Each case was divided into three levels based on TPS: <1%, 1%-49%, and ≥50%. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient for TPS was 0.902±0.058. Weighted κ coefficient for 3-step assessment was 0.748±0.093. The κ coefficients for 1% and 50% cut-offs were 0.633 and 0.834, respectively. There was a significant association between interobserver reproducibility and experience (formal PD-L1 training, more experience for PD-L1 assessment, and longer practice duration on surgical pathology), histologic subtype, and specimen type. Conclusions: Our results indicate that PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining provides a reproducible basis for decisions on anti-PD-1 therapy in NSCLC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-353
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Observer variation
  • Programmed cell death-ligand 1
  • Reproducibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interobserver reproducibility of PD-L1 biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study by 27 pathologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this