International expert consensus guidance on indications, implementation and quality measures for transanal total mesorectal excision

  • Michel Adamina
  • , Felix Aigner
  • , Sergio Araujo
  • , Alberto Arezzo
  • , Shady Ashamalla
  • , Teresa deBeche-Adams
  • , Stephen Bell
  • , Willem Bemelman
  • , Carl Brown
  • , Walter Brunner
  • , Nicolas Buchs
  • , Antonio Caycedo
  • , Sami Chadi
  • , Park Sung Chan
  • , David Clark
  • , Quentin Denost
  • , André D'Hoore
  • , Nicola Fearnhead
  • , Nader Francis
  • , Eelco de Graaf
  • Suguru Hasegawa, Julian Hayes, Alexander Heriot, Bert Houben, Masaaki Ito, Mark Katory, Jos Kleijnen, Werner Kneist, Joep Knol, Tsuyoshi Konishi, John Marks, Beatriz Martin-Perez, Justin Maykel, Elisabeth McLemore, Danilo Miskovic, Isacco Montroni, Gabriela Möslein, Jae Hwan Oh, Rodrigo Oliva Perez, Marta Penna, Frederic Ris, Gustavo Rossi, Eric Rullier, Gerald Seitinger, Antonino Spinelli, Andrew Stevenson, Patricia Sylla, Ichiro Takemasa, Pieter Tanis, Jared Torkington, Jurriaan Tuynman, Elena Vikis, Janindra Warusavitarne, Mark Whiteford, Hongwei Yao, Seong Hyeon Yun, Zhongtao Zhang, Minhua Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To provide dynamic guidance from a rigorous and up-to-date consensus on the safe implementation and application of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) from an international panel of expert surgeons and educationalists supported by 14 international surgical societies. Method: An adapted Delphi method and focus group discussion approach was implemented for this consensus process, with expert advice from a guidelines methodologist. Statements were generated focusing on three main topics relating to the safe implementation of TaTME: (1) indications, (2) quality and outcome measures, (3) training and implementation of TaTME. Results: Five rounds of the Delphi consensus process were completed over a 13-month period. A total of 56 surgeons experienced in TaTME and surgical education participated in this project. By Delphi round four, 80.0% or greater agreement was reached for all statements except for two, which were further reviewed during a fifth round. More complex cases that are likely to benefit from TaTME were identified, with the recommendation that they should be referred to TaTME expert centres. The most agreed upon definition of expert centres is outlined. Conclusion: We have provided a current framework of best practice related to implementation of TaTME. The statements are not indefinite and will continue to be ‘dynamic’ and updated as new evidence emerges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)749-755
Number of pages7
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • guidance
  • rectal cancer
  • rectal surgery
  • TaTME
  • TME

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International expert consensus guidance on indications, implementation and quality measures for transanal total mesorectal excision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this