Independent replication of advanced brain age in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: detection of future cognitive dysfunction

  • Helmet T. Karim
  • , Howard J. Aizenstein
  • , Akiko Mizuno
  • , Maria Ly
  • , Carmen Andreescu
  • , Minjie Wu
  • , Chang Hyung Hong
  • , Hyun Woong Roh
  • , Bumhee Park
  • , Heirim Lee
  • , Na Rae Kim
  • , Jin Wook Choi
  • , Sang Won Seo
  • , Seong Hye Choi
  • , Eun Joo Kim
  • , Byeong C. Kim
  • , Jae Youn Cheong
  • , Eunyoung Lee
  • , Dong gi Lee
  • , Yong Hyuk Cho
  • So Young Moon, Sang Joon Son

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

We previously developed a novel machine-learning-based brain age model that was sensitive to amyloid. We aimed to independently validate it and to demonstrate its utility using independent clinical data. We recruited 650 participants from South Korean memory clinics to undergo magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessments. We employed a pretrained brain age model that used data from an independent set of largely Caucasian individuals (n = 757) who had no or relatively low levels of amyloid as confirmed by positron emission tomography (PET). We investigated the association between brain age residual and cognitive decline. We found that our pretrained brain age model was able to reliably estimate brain age (mean absolute error = 5.68 years, r(650) = 0.47, age range = 49–89 year) in the sample with 71 participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 375 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 204 with dementia. Greater brain age was associated with greater amyloid and worse cognitive function [Odds Ratio, (95% Confidence Interval {CI}): 1.28 (1.06–1.55), p = 0.030 for amyloid PET positivity; 2.52 (1.76–3.61), p < 0.001 for dementia]. Baseline brain age residual was predictive of future cognitive worsening even after adjusting for apolipoprotein E e4 and amyloid status [Hazard Ratio, (95% CI): 1.94 (1.33–2.81), p = 0.001 for total 336 follow-up sample; 2.31 (1.44–3.71), p = 0.001 for 284 subsample with baseline Clinical Dementia Rating ≤ 0.5; 2.40 (1.43–4.03), p = 0.001 for 240 subsample with baseline SCD or MCI]. In independent data set, these results replicate our previous findings using this model, which was able to delineate significant differences in brain age according to the diagnostic stages of dementia as well as amyloid deposition status. Brain age models may offer benefits in discriminating and tracking cognitive impairment in older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5235-5243
Number of pages9
JournalMolecular Psychiatry
Volume27
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Independent replication of advanced brain age in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: detection of future cognitive dysfunction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this