Impact of sampling rate on statistical significance for single subject fMRI connectivity analysis

Oliver James, Hyunjin Park, Seong Gi Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

A typical time series in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) exhibits autocorrelation, that is, the samples of the time series are dependent. In addition, temporal filtering, one of the crucial steps in preprocessing of functional magnetic resonance images, induces its own autocorrelation. While performing connectivity analysis in fMRI, the impact of the autocorrelation is largely ignored. Recently, autocorrelation has been addressed by variance correction approaches, which are sensitive to the sampling rate. In this article, we aim to investigate the impact of the sampling rate on the variance correction approaches. Toward this end, we first derived a generalized expression for the variance of the sample Pearson correlation coefficient (SPCC) in terms of the sampling rate and the filter cutoff frequency, in addition to the autocorrelation and cross-covariance functions of the time series. Through simulations, we illustrated the importance of the variance correction for a fixed sampling rate. Using the real resting state fMRI data sets, we demonstrated that the data sets with higher sampling rates were more prone to false positives, in agreement with the existing empirical reports. We further demonstrated with single subject results that for the data sets with higher sampling rates, the variance correction strategy restored the integrity of true connectivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3321-3337
Number of pages17
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • autocorrelation
  • functional connectivity
  • resting-state fMRI
  • sample Pearson correlation coefficient
  • temporal filtering
  • variance correction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of sampling rate on statistical significance for single subject fMRI connectivity analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this