TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of pre-transplant renal dysfunction on 6-month graft failure in living versus deceased donor liver transplantation
T2 - Retrospective propensity score-matched study
AU - Oh, Eun Jung
AU - Ahn, Jin Hee
AU - Lee, Seunghyun
AU - Lee, Sung Hyun
AU - Ko, Justin Sangwook
AU - Gwak, Mi Sook
AU - Kim, Gaab Soo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Society of Coloproctology
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Introduction: We compared the effect of pre-liver transplantation (LT) renal dysfunction on mid-term post-transplant outcomes in LDLT versus DDLT. Methods: A total of 2133 adult patients who underwent LT between May 1996 and December 2021 were analyzed, with 445 patients selected in each group after propensity score matching. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of 6-month graft failure. Results: In the LDLT group, 64 % of recipients had no pre-LT renal dysfunction, while 36 % did (GroupL and GroupLR). In the DDLT group, 60 % of recipients had no pre-LT renal dysfunction, while 40 % did (GroupD and GroupDR). The patients with pre-LT renal dysfunction experienced a significantly higher rate of 6-month graft failure in both groups (L vs. LR, p = 0.002, and D vs. DR, p = 0.016). However, there was no significant difference in 6-month graft failure risk between LDLT with pre-LT renal dysfunction and DDLT, with or without pre-LT renal dysfunction. Conclusions: Renal dysfunction prior to LT has a negative impact on mid-term outcomes. Interestingly, LDLT recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction did not show superior graft survival compared to DDLT recipients, irrespective of their renal function status. Thus, our study emphasizes the importance to consider renal function at the time of LT.
AB - Introduction: We compared the effect of pre-liver transplantation (LT) renal dysfunction on mid-term post-transplant outcomes in LDLT versus DDLT. Methods: A total of 2133 adult patients who underwent LT between May 1996 and December 2021 were analyzed, with 445 patients selected in each group after propensity score matching. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of 6-month graft failure. Results: In the LDLT group, 64 % of recipients had no pre-LT renal dysfunction, while 36 % did (GroupL and GroupLR). In the DDLT group, 60 % of recipients had no pre-LT renal dysfunction, while 40 % did (GroupD and GroupDR). The patients with pre-LT renal dysfunction experienced a significantly higher rate of 6-month graft failure in both groups (L vs. LR, p = 0.002, and D vs. DR, p = 0.016). However, there was no significant difference in 6-month graft failure risk between LDLT with pre-LT renal dysfunction and DDLT, with or without pre-LT renal dysfunction. Conclusions: Renal dysfunction prior to LT has a negative impact on mid-term outcomes. Interestingly, LDLT recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction did not show superior graft survival compared to DDLT recipients, irrespective of their renal function status. Thus, our study emphasizes the importance to consider renal function at the time of LT.
KW - Deceased donor liver transplantation
KW - Graft failure
KW - Living donor liver transplantation
KW - Mortality
KW - Pre-LT renal dysfunction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018645914
U2 - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.08.304
DO - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.08.304
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105018645914
SN - 1015-9584
JO - Asian Journal of Surgery
JF - Asian Journal of Surgery
ER -