Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of ischemia-guided revascularization with myocardial perfusion imaging for patients with multivessel coronary disease

  • Young Hak Kim
  • , Jung Min Ahn
  • , Duk Woo Park
  • , Hae Geun Song
  • , Jong Young Lee
  • , Won Jang Kim
  • , Sung Cheol Yun
  • , Soo Jin Kang
  • , Seung Whan Lee
  • , Cheol Whan Lee
  • , Dae Hyuk Moon
  • , Cheol Hyun Chung
  • , Jae Won Lee
  • , Seong Wook Park
  • , Seung Jung Park
  • University of Ulsan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ischemia-guided (IG) revascularization. Background: The importance of IG revascularization has not been well-determined. Methods: The outcomes of IG revascularization, in which revascularization was performed in the matched coronary artery with the perfusion abnormality on myocardial perfusion image (MPI), were retrospectively compared with those of non-IG revascularization in a registry of 5,340 patients with multivessel coronary disease comprising 2,587 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) with drug-eluting stents and 2,753 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries after adjustment with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting. Results: The MPI was performed in 42.3% of patients, and IG revascularization was performed in 17.3%, including 12.4% in PCI and 21.8% in CABG patients (p < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the IG than in the non-IG group (16.2% vs. 20.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60 to 0.88; p = 0.001), primarily driven by the lower repeat revascularization rate (9.9% vs. 22.8%; aHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.90; p = 0.009). Subgroup analysis showed that IG reduced the risk of MACCE in PCI (17.4% vs. 22.8%; aHR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.81; p = 0.001) but not in CABG (16.0% vs. 18.5%; aHR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.14; p = 0.31) patients. Conclusions: Ischemia-guided revascularization with MPI, particularly in PCI-treated patients, seems to decrease the risk of repeat revascularization and MACCE for patients with multivessel disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-190
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • bypass surgery
  • coronary disease
  • myocardial perfusion imaging
  • revascularization
  • stents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of ischemia-guided revascularization with myocardial perfusion imaging for patients with multivessel coronary disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this