How much have the perinatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies improved over the last two decades?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective This study was conducted to demonstrate the temporal trends in perinatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies over the last two decades. Methods The medical records of patients with triplet pregnancies at two Korean tertiary-care hospitals from 1992 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed in regard to maternal and neonatal outcomes. The study was divided into two periods for analysis: period I (1992-2001) and period II (2003-2012). Results Over a 21-year period, 65 women with triplet pregnancies and 185 neonates were analyzed. Period II, when compared with period I, was associated with improved maternal outcomes, characterized by a decreased incidence of preeclampsia (31.8% vs. 2.3%, P=0.002) and anemia (68.2% vs. 30.2%, P=0.003) during pregnancy. Regarding neonatal aspects, the composite morbidity of period II was significantly decreased compared with that of period I, as assessed with a generalized estimating equation for logistic regression (26.2% vs. 8.1%, P=0.03). Multivariable analysis revealed that the gestational age at delivery and the period were significantly associated with the composite neonatal morbidity (P < 0.001 and 0.007, respectively). Conclusion Improved neonatal morbidity was associated with a higher gestational age at delivery and with the more recent decade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-232
Number of pages9
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology Science
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy outcome
  • Preterm birth
  • Triplets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How much have the perinatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies improved over the last two decades?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this