TY - JOUR
T1 - Hook Fixation at Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra +1 Reduced Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Patients With Spinal Deformity Having Achieved Optimal Deformity Correction by Sagittal Age-Adjusted Score
AU - Park, Se Jun
AU - Park, Jin Sung
AU - Kang, Dong Ho
AU - Kim, Hyun Jun
AU - Lee, Chong Suh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Appropriate correction relative to the age-adjusted sagittal alignment target reduces the proximal junctional failure (PJF) risk. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from PJF despite optimal correction. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of PJF that occurs despite optimal correction relative to the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older with adult spinal deformity who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were initially screened. Among them, only patients who achieved optimal sagittal correction relative to the SAAS were included in the study. Optimal correction was defined as the SAAS point between -1 and +1. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between the PJF and no PJF groups and were further evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 127 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and there were 111 women (87.4%). A mean of total fusion length was 7.2. PJF occurred in 42 patients (33.1%), while 85 patients (66.9%) did not develop PJF. Multivariate analysis showed that a high body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.027-1.295, P =.016), a higher lordosis distribution index (LDI) (OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003-1.045, P =.022), and no use of hook fixation (OR = 9.708, 95% CI = 1.121-76.923, P =.032) were significant risk factors of PJF development. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff value for the LDI was calculated as 61.0% (area under the curve = 0.790, P <.001). CONCLUSION: PJF developed in a considerable portion of patients despite optimal correction relative to the age-adjusted alignment. The risk factors of PJF in this patient group were high body mass index, high LDI exceeding 61%, and no use of hook fixation. PJF could be further decreased by properly managing these risk factors along with optimal sagittal correction.
AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Appropriate correction relative to the age-adjusted sagittal alignment target reduces the proximal junctional failure (PJF) risk. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from PJF despite optimal correction. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of PJF that occurs despite optimal correction relative to the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older with adult spinal deformity who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were initially screened. Among them, only patients who achieved optimal sagittal correction relative to the SAAS were included in the study. Optimal correction was defined as the SAAS point between -1 and +1. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between the PJF and no PJF groups and were further evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 127 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and there were 111 women (87.4%). A mean of total fusion length was 7.2. PJF occurred in 42 patients (33.1%), while 85 patients (66.9%) did not develop PJF. Multivariate analysis showed that a high body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.027-1.295, P =.016), a higher lordosis distribution index (LDI) (OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003-1.045, P =.022), and no use of hook fixation (OR = 9.708, 95% CI = 1.121-76.923, P =.032) were significant risk factors of PJF development. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff value for the LDI was calculated as 61.0% (area under the curve = 0.790, P <.001). CONCLUSION: PJF developed in a considerable portion of patients despite optimal correction relative to the age-adjusted alignment. The risk factors of PJF in this patient group were high body mass index, high LDI exceeding 61%, and no use of hook fixation. PJF could be further decreased by properly managing these risk factors along with optimal sagittal correction.
KW - Adult spinal deformity
KW - Hook fixation
KW - Optimal sagittal correction
KW - Proximal junctional failure
KW - Risk factors
KW - Sagittal age-adjusted score
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215663895
U2 - 10.1227/neu.0000000000003075
DO - 10.1227/neu.0000000000003075
M3 - Article
C2 - 38934636
AN - SCOPUS:85215663895
SN - 0148-396X
VL - 96
SP - 308
EP - 317
JO - Neurosurgery
JF - Neurosurgery
IS - 2
ER -