Abstract
This study proposes a framework of data-driven administration built on both data and value dimensions and thereby suggests four possible types arising from cases (data-rich and value neutral, data-rich and value-controversial, data-poor and value-neutral, and data-poor and value-controversial). Using an exploratory case study approach, we discuss data-driven administration in the perspective of evidence-based policy-making. Following the tradition of evidence-based policy-making, the advancement of data analytics promotes data-driven administration to solve social problems and innovate government operations. We review relevant cases in Korea and then illustrates how the combinations of two dimensions make practices of data-driven administration successful or not. There is little study pointing out to be mindful of values embedded with social issues in certain domains, even when approached with data-driven administration. The framework of data-driven administration can be used for the better understanding of increasing data analytics practices in the public sector with guiding principles of data readiness and value controversy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 291-307 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International Review of Public Administration |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- big data
- Data-driven administration
- evidence-based policy-making
- public value
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From evidence-based policy making to data-driven administration: proposing the data vs. value framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver