Abstract
Objectives: An open-label, randomized trial was conducted to examine the effects of risedronate versus menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in postmenopausal women with recent hip fracture. Methods: Among 1165 eligible women, 281 were recruited and randomly assigned to receive oral risedronate (35 mg/week) or percutaneous estradiol gel (1.5 mg/day) plus oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/day) for 4 years. The primary end point was recurrent fracture and the secondary end points were mortality and bone mineral density (BMD). Results: Kaplan–Meier analyses showed no significant differences in fracture recurrence and mortality between the two groups. The incidence of any new fracture per 100 person-years (PY) was 8.63 in the risedronate group and 12.86 in the MHT group (p = 0.180); that of clinical fracture was 4.75 and 6.99, respectively (p = 0.265); and that of asymptomatic vertebral fracture was 4.87 and 5.58, respectively (p = 0.764). The respective incidence of death per 100 PY was 3.58 and 4.40 (p = 0.503). BMD increased comparably at the lumbar spine in both groups. BMD at the total hip did not change in the risedronate group, but increased significantly by 2.8% in the MHT group. Conclusions: MHT might not differ from risedronate in the prevention of secondary fractures and death among postmenopausal women with recent hip fracture.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 408-414 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Climacteric |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- hip fracture
- Menopausal hormone therapy
- mortality
- new fracture
- risedronate