Fictional Creationism and Negative Existentials

In this paper, I defend fictional creationism, the view that fictional objects are abstract artifacts, from the objection that the apparent truth of fictional negative existentials, such as Sherlock Holmes does not exist, poses a serious problem for creationism. I develop a sophisticated version of the pragmatic approach by focusing on the inconsistent referential intentions of ordinary speakers: the upshot would be that creationism is no worse - perhaps even in a better position - than anti-realism, even if we restrict our linguistic data to fictional negative existentals.