Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Features of T1 pancreatic cancer and validation of the eighth edition AJCC staging system definition using a Korean–Japanese joint cohort and the SEER database

  • Wooil Kwon
  • , Jin Seok Heo
  • , In Woong Han
  • , Chang Moo Kang
  • , Ho Kyoung Hwang
  • , Song Cheol Kim
  • , Sang Jae Park
  • , Yoo Seok Yoon
  • , Yong Hoon Kim
  • , Chang Sup Lim
  • , Seung Yeoun Lee
  • , Taesung Park
  • , Hideki Takami
  • , Nobuyuki Watanabe
  • , Yasuhiro Shimizu
  • , Masataka Okuno
  • , Hiroki Yamaue
  • , Manabu Kawai
  • , Hirono Seiko
  • , Yuichi Nagakawa
  • Hiroaki Osakabe, Teiichi Sugiura, Hirochika Toyama, Masayuki Ohtsuka, Michiaki Unno, Itaru Endo, Minoru Kitago, Jin Young Jang
  • Seoul National University
  • Yonsei University
  • University of Ulsan
  • National Cancer Center Korea
  • Keimyung University
  • Sejong University
  • Nagoya University
  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute
  • Wakayama Medical University
  • Tokyo Medical University
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center
  • Kobe University
  • Chiba University
  • Tohoku University
  • Yokohama City University
  • Keio University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Little is known about the features of T1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its definition in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system needs validation. The aims were to analyze the clinicopathologic features of T1 PDAC and investigate the validity of its definition. Method: Data from 1506 patients with confirmed T1 PDAC between 2000 and 2019 were collected and analyzed. The results were validated using 3092 T1 PDAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: The median survival duration of patients was 50 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 45.1%. R0 resection was unachievable in 10.0% of patients, the nodal metastasis rate was 40.0%, and recurrence occurred in 55.2%. The current T1 subcategorization was not feasible for PDAC, tumors with extrapancreatic extension (72.8%) had worse outcomes than those without extrapancreatic extension (median survival 107 vs. 39 months, p <.001). Extrapancreatic extension was an independent prognostic factor whereas the current T1 subcategorization was not. The results of this study were reproducible with data from the SEER database. Conclusion: Despite its small size, T1 PDAC displayed aggressive behavior warranting active local and systemic treatment. The subcategorization by the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system was not adequate for PDAC, and better subcategorization methods need to be explored. In addition, the role of extrapancreatic extension in the staging system should be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1129-1140
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • extrapancreatic extension
  • pancreatic cancer
  • stage
  • subcategorization
  • T1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Features of T1 pancreatic cancer and validation of the eighth edition AJCC staging system definition using a Korean–Japanese joint cohort and the SEER database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this