TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction in patients with localized recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
AU - Paik, E. Sun
AU - Lee, Yoo Young
AU - Kim, Tae Joong
AU - Choi, Chel Hun
AU - Lee, Jeong Won
AU - Kim, Byoung Gie
AU - Bae, Duk Soo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Objective: To assess the feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction in patients with localized recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by comparing its outcomes to those of laparotomy. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis in 79 EOC patients who had a localized single recurrent site, as demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography/CT scan; had no ascites; were disease-free for 12 or more months prior; and who had undergone secondary cytoreduction (laparoscopy in 31 patients, laparotomy in 48 patients) at Samsung Medical Center between 2002 and 2013. By reviewing the electronic medical records, we investigated the patients’ baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy patients in terms of age, body mass index, cancer antigen 125 level, tumor type, initial stage, grade, recurrence site, type of procedures used in the secondary cytoreduction, adjuvant chemotherapy, and disease-free interval from the previous treatment. With regards to surgical outcomes, reduced operating time, shorter hospital stay, and less estimated blood loss were achieved in the laparoscopy group. Complete debulking was achieved in all cases in the laparoscopy group. Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach is feasible without compromising morbidity and survival in selected groups of patients with recurrent EOC. The laparoscopic approach can be a possible treatment option for recurrent EOC.
AB - Objective: To assess the feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction in patients with localized recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by comparing its outcomes to those of laparotomy. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis in 79 EOC patients who had a localized single recurrent site, as demonstrated by computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission tomography/CT scan; had no ascites; were disease-free for 12 or more months prior; and who had undergone secondary cytoreduction (laparoscopy in 31 patients, laparotomy in 48 patients) at Samsung Medical Center between 2002 and 2013. By reviewing the electronic medical records, we investigated the patients’ baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy patients in terms of age, body mass index, cancer antigen 125 level, tumor type, initial stage, grade, recurrence site, type of procedures used in the secondary cytoreduction, adjuvant chemotherapy, and disease-free interval from the previous treatment. With regards to surgical outcomes, reduced operating time, shorter hospital stay, and less estimated blood loss were achieved in the laparoscopy group. Complete debulking was achieved in all cases in the laparoscopy group. Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach is feasible without compromising morbidity and survival in selected groups of patients with recurrent EOC. The laparoscopic approach can be a possible treatment option for recurrent EOC.
KW - Cytoreduction surgical procedures
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Local
KW - Neoplasm recurrence
KW - Ovarian neoplasms
KW - Retrospective studies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84962459980
U2 - 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e24
DO - 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e24
M3 - Article
C2 - 27029745
AN - SCOPUS:84962459980
SN - 2005-0380
VL - 27
JO - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
M1 - e24
ER -