Abstract
Urine drug screen (UDS) immunoassays are a quick and inexpensive method for determining the presence of drugs of abuse. Many crossreactivities exist with other analytes, potentially causing a falsepositive result in an initial drug screen. Knowledge of these potential interferents is important in determining a course of action for patient care. We present an inclusive review of analytes causing falsepositive interferences with drugs-of-abuse UDS immunoassays, which covers the literature from the year 2000 to present. English language articles were searched via the SciFinder platform with the strings 'false positive [drug] urine' yielding 173 articles. These articles were then carefully analyzed and condensed to 62 that included data on causes of false-positive results. The discussion is separated into six sections by drug class with a corresponding table of crossreacting compounds for quick reference. False-positive results were described for amphetamines, opiates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, phencyclidine, lysergic acid diethylamide and barbiturates. These false-positive results support the generally accepted practice that immunoassay positive results are considered presumptive until confirmed by a second independent chemical technique.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | bku075 |
| Pages (from-to) | 387-396 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Analytical Toxicology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver