False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: A review

Alec Saitman, Hyung Doo Park, Robert L. Fitzgerald

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

275 Scopus citations

Abstract

Urine drug screen (UDS) immunoassays are a quick and inexpensive method for determining the presence of drugs of abuse. Many crossreactivities exist with other analytes, potentially causing a falsepositive result in an initial drug screen. Knowledge of these potential interferents is important in determining a course of action for patient care. We present an inclusive review of analytes causing falsepositive interferences with drugs-of-abuse UDS immunoassays, which covers the literature from the year 2000 to present. English language articles were searched via the SciFinder platform with the strings 'false positive [drug] urine' yielding 173 articles. These articles were then carefully analyzed and condensed to 62 that included data on causes of false-positive results. The discussion is separated into six sections by drug class with a corresponding table of crossreacting compounds for quick reference. False-positive results were described for amphetamines, opiates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, phencyclidine, lysergic acid diethylamide and barbiturates. These false-positive results support the generally accepted practice that immunoassay positive results are considered presumptive until confirmed by a second independent chemical technique.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberbku075
Pages (from-to)387-396
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Analytical Toxicology
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this