Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors determining successful computed tomography-guided localization of lung nodules

  • Sungkyunkwan University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the factors related to the successful computed tomography-guided nodule localization for subsequent nodule excision. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for 181 patients who had undergone computed tomography-guided nodule localization using hook wire and subsequent video-assisted thoracic surgery resection for lung nodules. The demographic factors, nodule factors, and technical factors were reviewed to determine what affects effective nodule localization for video-assisted thoracic surgery resection using both univariate and multivariate models. Results: A total of 174 patients were included in our study. Successful localization was accomplished in 166 patients (95%). Univariate analysis implicated patient age, nodule solidity, zonal location, and a sufficient distance between the hook wire tip and pleural surface as significant factors for successful localization. Multivariate analysis focused on the distance between the wire tip and pleural surface as the sole independent factor for successful localization (P = .012). Conclusions: The distance between the hook wire tip and pleural surface was the major significant factor for successful computed tomography-guided nodule localization for subsequent video-assisted thoracic surgery resection. Thus, the localization of a hook wire adjacent to a target nodule with sufficient depth from the pleural surface is crucial to the success of the procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)809-814
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume143
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors determining successful computed tomography-guided localization of lung nodules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this