Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence for CP violation in B+ →k∗ (892)+π0 from a Dalitz plot analysis of B+ → KS0 π+π0 decays

  • (The B aBar Collaboration)
  • Université Savoie Mont Blanc
  • University of Barcelona
  • National Institute for Nuclear Physics
  • University of Bari
  • University of Bergen
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Ruhr University Bochum
  • University of British Columbia
  • Brunel University London
  • Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the RAS
  • Novosibirsk State University
  • Novosibirsk State Technical University
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of California at Riverside
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • California Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We report a Dalitz plot analysis of charmless hadronic decays of charged B mesons to the final state KS0π+π0 using the full BABAR data set of 470.9±2.8 million BB events collected at the ϒ(4S) resonance. We measure the overall branching fraction and CP asymmetry to be B(B+→K0π+π0)=(31.8±1.8±2.1-0.0+6.0)×10-6 and ACP(B+→K0π+π0)=0.07±0.05±0.03-0.03+0.02, where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and due to the signal model, respectively. This is the first measurement of the branching fraction for B+→K0π+π0. We find first evidence of a CP asymmetry in B+→K∗(892)+π0 decays: ACP(B+→K∗(892)+π0)=-0.52±0.14±0.04-0.02+0.04. The significance of this asymmetry, including systematic and model uncertainties, is 3.4 standard deviations. We also measure the branching fractions and CP asymmetries for three other intermediate decay modes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number072001
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume96
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for CP violation in B+ →k∗ (892)+π0 from a Dalitz plot analysis of B+ → KS0 π+π0 decays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this