Evaluation of Modified Fasting Protocols to Shorten Fasting Time Before Sedation in Children: A Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Eunah Cho, Jin Young Song, June Huh, I. Seok Kang, Hyun Ju Kim, In Young Youn, Hyebin Lee, Ji Hee Kwak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Backgrounds: Guidelines for fasting before procedural sedation aim to prevent pulmonary aspiration and are primarily targeted for deep sedation. Our study explored whether a shortened fasting protocol is noninferior to the standard protocol by comparing gastric contents evaluated by ultrasound. Methods: Pediatric patients aged < 3 years, scheduled for elective transthoracic echocardiography under sedation, were randomly allocated to a standard group (4-h fasting) or a modified group (4-h fasting for solid and 1-h fasting for water). Gastric ultrasound was performed to evaluate cross-sectional area (CSA) in supine and right lateral decubitus positions (RLDP), with the upper body elevated at 45°. The primary outcome was the CSA-RLDP (CSARLDP 45). A noninferiority test was performed applying the delta (Δ) of 2.1. Results: The noninferiority test showed that the modified fasting protocol was noninferior to the standard fasting protocol in terms of CSARLDP 45, with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 0.16 (−0.55 to 0.87) within the noninferiority range of delta. Conclusion: The modified fasting protocol was noninferior to the standard in pediatric patients undergoing sedation for transthoracic echocardiography, as assessed by gastric ultrasound. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05810532.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)753-760
Number of pages8
JournalPaediatric Anaesthesia
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Keywords

  • fasting guideline
  • fasting time
  • gastric ultrasound
  • pediatric
  • sedation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Modified Fasting Protocols to Shorten Fasting Time Before Sedation in Children: A Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this