TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of creep properties considering the friction effect of the small punch test
AU - Kim, Sangyeop
AU - Ro, Uijeong
AU - Lee, Taeksang
AU - Kim, Moon Ki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/3/8
Y1 - 2024/3/8
N2 - In contrast to the Uniaxial Creep Test (UCT), where each stress produces a corresponding strain, the Small Punch Creep Test (SPCT) generates displacement in response to applied loads. Therefore, for the direct application of SPCT in creep damage assessment, it becomes imperative to convert the displacement and load data into the strain and stress parameters observed in the UCT. Unlike the UCT, which applies the load directly to the specimen, the SPCT indirectly imposes the load on the specimen through a punch ball. This divergence in loading methods introduces friction between the specimen and the punch ball during the SPCT. This study delves into the analysis of the friction coefficient between the specimen and punch ball using the Finite Element Method (FEM). Additionally, we explore the relationship between the specimen's minimum thickness and the friction coefficient. In conclusion, we propose a correlation between the creep properties of the two test methods, with the objective of accurately capturing the influence of friction between the specimen and punch ball in the SPCT.
AB - In contrast to the Uniaxial Creep Test (UCT), where each stress produces a corresponding strain, the Small Punch Creep Test (SPCT) generates displacement in response to applied loads. Therefore, for the direct application of SPCT in creep damage assessment, it becomes imperative to convert the displacement and load data into the strain and stress parameters observed in the UCT. Unlike the UCT, which applies the load directly to the specimen, the SPCT indirectly imposes the load on the specimen through a punch ball. This divergence in loading methods introduces friction between the specimen and the punch ball during the SPCT. This study delves into the analysis of the friction coefficient between the specimen and punch ball using the Finite Element Method (FEM). Additionally, we explore the relationship between the specimen's minimum thickness and the friction coefficient. In conclusion, we propose a correlation between the creep properties of the two test methods, with the objective of accurately capturing the influence of friction between the specimen and punch ball in the SPCT.
KW - Equivalent conversion equation
KW - Finite element method
KW - Friction
KW - Norton creep model
KW - Small punch creep test
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184063941
U2 - 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109879
DO - 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109879
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85184063941
SN - 0013-7944
VL - 298
JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics
JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics
M1 - 109879
ER -