Etiologic distribution, diagnostic tests and treatment in prospectively registered patients with DILD for two years in a tertiary medical center

Introduction: Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILD) comprise of a large group of lung diseases with diverse etiologies. They are classified into four categories based on the etiology and pathological findings. In Korea, epidemiological data on DILD has never been reported in a prospective manner. Method: From May 2002 to April 2004, total 487 patients with DILD were prospectively registered at Samsung Medical Center. The prospective observational analysis of the etiologies, its classification based on 2002 ATS/ERS (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society) guidelines, as well as diagnostic tests and the retrospective analysis of the treatment modalities were carried out. Any infectious and malignant causes were excluded. Results: 1) The patients were classified into idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) in 269 patients (55.2%), known causes of DILD in 168 patients (34.5%), sarcoidosis in 27 patients (5.5%), other forms of DILD in 14 patients (2.9%), and undetermined DILD in 9 patients (1.9%). 2) The diagnostic test showed that most patients had undergone chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function test (PFT) (97%, 89%). Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and surgical lung biopsy (SLB) were performed in limited patients (38%, 29%). 3) Among 269 patients with IIP, 220 (82%) had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) while 23 (9%) had nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. SLB was carried out in 36% of patients with IIP. 4) Symptomatic supportive care was given to 67% of IPF, but specific medical treatment including corticosteroids was administered to 89% of non-IPF patients. Conclusion: A nationwide registry of DILD patients is required to determine the annual incidence, etiology, and practice pattern of diagnosis and treatment in Korea.