Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer

  • EV-302 Trial Investigators
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Klinikum Stuttgart
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • AZ Maria Middelares
  • University of Antwerp
  • Yonsei University
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • University Eye Clinic
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taichung Taiwan
  • Ministry of Health, Turkey
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Gustave Roussy
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Seagen Inc.
  • Astellas Pharma Inc.
  • Merck
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND No treatment has surpassed platinum-based chemotherapy in improving overall survival in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. METHODS We conducted a phase 3, global, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously on days 1 and 8) and pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg intravenously on day 1) (enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group) or gemcitabine and either cisplatin or carboplatin (determined on the basis of eligibility to receive cisplatin) (chemotherapy group). The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 886 patients underwent randomization: 442 to the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group and 444 to the chemotherapy group. As of August 8, 2023, the median duration of follow-up for survival was 17.2 months. Progression-free survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 12.5 months vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.54; P<0.001), as was overall survival (median, 31.5 months vs. 16.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.58; P<0.001). The median number of cycles was 12 (range, 1 to 46) in the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group and 6 (range, 1 to 6) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.9% of the patients in the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group and in 69.5% of those in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab resulted in significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with a safety profile consistent with that in previous reports.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)875-888
Number of pages14
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume390
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 Mar 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this