Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients with comorbid diseases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a new and potentially curative method for treating gastrointestinal neoplasms, may have longer procedure time and the risk of complications when compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD in patients with comorbid diseases. Methods: The outcomes of 337 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer at Samsung Medical Center from April 2003 to December 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. The Charlson comorbidity scale was used to divide the patients into low-risk (no risk factor) and high-risk (at least one risk factor) groups. The outcomes and complications were compared between the high-and low- risk groups. Results: The low- and high-risk groups comprised 240 and 97 patients with mean ages of 61.1 and 64.7 years, respectively (p=0.002). Tumor location, tumor size, depth of invasion, procedure duration, and rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, complication, and recurrence did not differ significantly between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: ESD may be a safe and effective treatment for early gastric cancer in patients with comorbid diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-191
Number of pages6
JournalGut and Liver
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Comorbid disease
  • Complication
  • Early gastric cancer
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients with comorbid diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this