TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of BVAC-C in HPV type 16- or 18–positive cervical carcinoma who failed 1st platinum-based chemotherapy
T2 - a phase I/IIa study
AU - Choi, Chel Hun
AU - Lee, Jeong Won
AU - Bae, Duk Soo
AU - Kang, Eun Suk
AU - Cho, Duck
AU - Kim, Yong Man
AU - Kim, Kidong
AU - Kim, Jae Weon
AU - Kim, Hee Seung
AU - Kim, Young Tae
AU - Lee, Jung Yun
AU - Lim, Myong Cheol
AU - Oh, Taegwon
AU - Song, Boyeong
AU - Jeon, Insu
AU - Park, Myunghwan
AU - Kim, Wu Hyun
AU - Kang, Chang Yuil
AU - Kim, Byoung Gie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Choi, Lee, Bae, Kang, Cho, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Lee, Lim, Oh, Song, Jeon, Park, Kim, Kang and Kim.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: BVAC-C, a B cell– and monocyte-based immunotherapeutic vaccine transfected with recombinant HPV E6/E7, was well tolerated in HPV–positive recurrent cervical carcinoma patients in a phase I study. This phase IIa study investigates the antitumor activity of BVAC-C in patients with HPV 16– or 18–positive cervical cancer who had experienced recurrence after a platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Patients were allocated to 3 arms; Arm 1, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8 weeks; Arm 2, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks; Arm 3, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks with topotecan at 2, 6, 10, 14 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by an independent radiologist according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 30 patients available for analysis, the ORR was 19.2% (Arm 1: 20.0% (3/15), Arm 2: 33.3% (2/6), Arm3: 0%) and the DCR was 53.8% (Arm 1: 57.1%, Arm 2: 28.6%, Arm3: 14.3%). The median DOR was 7.5 months (95% CI 7.1–not reported), the median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2–10.3), and the median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI 12.0–not reported). All evaluated patients showed not only inflammatory cytokine responses (IFN-γ or TNF-α) but also potent E6/E7-specific T cell responses upon vaccinations. Immune responses of patients after vaccination were correlated with their clinical responses. Conclusion: BVAC-C represents a promising treatment option and a manageable safety profile in the second-line setting for this patient population. Further studies are needed to identify potential biomarkers of response. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02866006.
AB - Background: BVAC-C, a B cell– and monocyte-based immunotherapeutic vaccine transfected with recombinant HPV E6/E7, was well tolerated in HPV–positive recurrent cervical carcinoma patients in a phase I study. This phase IIa study investigates the antitumor activity of BVAC-C in patients with HPV 16– or 18–positive cervical cancer who had experienced recurrence after a platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Patients were allocated to 3 arms; Arm 1, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8 weeks; Arm 2, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks; Arm 3, BVAC-C injection at 0, 4, 8, 12 weeks with topotecan at 2, 6, 10, 14 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by an independent radiologist according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 30 patients available for analysis, the ORR was 19.2% (Arm 1: 20.0% (3/15), Arm 2: 33.3% (2/6), Arm3: 0%) and the DCR was 53.8% (Arm 1: 57.1%, Arm 2: 28.6%, Arm3: 14.3%). The median DOR was 7.5 months (95% CI 7.1–not reported), the median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2–10.3), and the median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI 12.0–not reported). All evaluated patients showed not only inflammatory cytokine responses (IFN-γ or TNF-α) but also potent E6/E7-specific T cell responses upon vaccinations. Immune responses of patients after vaccination were correlated with their clinical responses. Conclusion: BVAC-C represents a promising treatment option and a manageable safety profile in the second-line setting for this patient population. Further studies are needed to identify potential biomarkers of response. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02866006.
KW - BVAC-C
KW - cervical cancer
KW - HPV 16
KW - HPV 18
KW - therapeutic vaccine
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85190131947
U2 - 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1371353
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1371353
M3 - Article
C2 - 38605958
AN - SCOPUS:85190131947
SN - 1664-3224
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Immunology
JF - Frontiers in Immunology
M1 - 1371353
ER -