Effects of coverage extent and slice skipping on mean and maximum arterial 18F-FDG uptake ratios in patients with carotid plaque

Tae Soo Noh, Jang Yoo, Se Won Kim, Eun Jeong Lee, Joon Young Choi, Byung Tae Kim, Kyung Han Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the effects of variable measurement methods on mean and maximum SUV ratios of 18FFDG uptake in carotid arteries. Methods 18F-FDG PET/CT images of 74 subjects with carotid plaque were analyzed for mean and maximum target-to-background ratio (TBR) of uptake. Agreement was analyzed between TBR scores obtained using different vessel coverage and slice skipping. Results Mean TBR was increased by extending coverage from common carotid artery (CCA; 1.25) to carotid artery (CA; 1.33) and inclusion of ascending aorta (CA/AA; 1.34). Maximum TBR was increased from 1.47 to 1.54 and 1.61 by respective extensions. Both mean and maximum TBR were closely correlated between vessels. ICC and Kappa statistics revealed near perfect agreement between TBR obtained using every 2 or 3 segments and that without sipping. Bland-Altman plots showed bias by slice skipping to remain small, particularly for mean TBR. Finally, high correlations were displayed between mean and maximum TBR. Conclusions Analysis of mean and maximum arterial 18F-FDG uptake in patients with carotid plaque is likely to benefit from extending coverage to segments above and below the CCA. The extra burden of measurement, in turn, can be lightened by skipping up to every 2 of 3 slices without compromising accuracy of results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-722
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Nuclear Medicine
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • 18F-FDG
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Carotid artery
  • PET/CT
  • Uptake ratio

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of coverage extent and slice skipping on mean and maximum arterial 18F-FDG uptake ratios in patients with carotid plaque'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this