TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of cancer stigma on quality of life of patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer
AU - Kim, Naru
AU - Kang, Danbee
AU - Shin, Sang Hyun
AU - Heo, Jin Seok
AU - Shim, Sungkeun
AU - Lim, Jihyun
AU - Cho, Juhee
AU - Han, In Woong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Backgrounds/Aims: Cancer stigma (CS), a self-inflicted sense of hopelessness, has been identified as a major factor affecting cancer patients’ outcomes. However, few studies have investigated the CS-related outcomes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) cancer. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate effects of CS on quality of life (QoL) of HBP cancer. Methods: From 2017 to 2018, 73 patients who underwent curative surgery for HBP tumor at a single intuitive were enrolled prospectively. The QoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL score, and CS was evaluated in three categories, “impossibility of recovery,” “cancer stereotypes,” and “social discrimination.” the stigma was defined by higher scores of attitudes compared with the median value. Results: The stigma group showed a lower QoL (–17.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: –26.75 to 8.60, p < 0.001) than the no stigma group. Similarly, most function and symptoms of the stigma group showed worse results than the no stigma group. The difference in function scores between the two groups according to CS was highest in cognitive function (–21.20, 95% CI: –30.36 to 12.04, p < 0.001). Fatigue showed the largest difference between the two groups at 22.84 (95% CI: 12.88–32.07, p < 0.001) and was the most severe symptom in stigma group. Conclusions: CS was an important negative factor affecting the QoL, function, and symptoms of HBP cancer patients. Therefore, appropriate management of CS is crucial for improved postoperative QoL.
AB - Backgrounds/Aims: Cancer stigma (CS), a self-inflicted sense of hopelessness, has been identified as a major factor affecting cancer patients’ outcomes. However, few studies have investigated the CS-related outcomes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) cancer. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate effects of CS on quality of life (QoL) of HBP cancer. Methods: From 2017 to 2018, 73 patients who underwent curative surgery for HBP tumor at a single intuitive were enrolled prospectively. The QoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL score, and CS was evaluated in three categories, “impossibility of recovery,” “cancer stereotypes,” and “social discrimination.” the stigma was defined by higher scores of attitudes compared with the median value. Results: The stigma group showed a lower QoL (–17.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: –26.75 to 8.60, p < 0.001) than the no stigma group. Similarly, most function and symptoms of the stigma group showed worse results than the no stigma group. The difference in function scores between the two groups according to CS was highest in cognitive function (–21.20, 95% CI: –30.36 to 12.04, p < 0.001). Fatigue showed the largest difference between the two groups at 22.84 (95% CI: 12.88–32.07, p < 0.001) and was the most severe symptom in stigma group. Conclusions: CS was an important negative factor affecting the QoL, function, and symptoms of HBP cancer patients. Therefore, appropriate management of CS is crucial for improved postoperative QoL.
KW - Bile ducts
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Pancreas
KW - Quality of life
KW - Stigma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85160425103
U2 - 10.14701/ahbps.22-084
DO - 10.14701/ahbps.22-084
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160425103
SN - 2508-5778
VL - 27
SP - 172
EP - 179
JO - Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
JF - Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
IS - 2
ER -