Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Continuous Intra-Arterial Nimodipine Infusion for the Treatment of Refractory Vasospasm after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

  • Hyunbong Lee
  • , Jongjoo Lee
  • , Myung Sub Kim
  • , Jiwook Ryu
  • , Youngbo Shim
  • , Yeongu Chung
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
  • Kyung Hee University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a severe complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), potentially leading to functional impairments. Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is one of the primary mechanisms of DCI. In cases of medically refractory CVS, intra-arterial (IA) nimodipine is a rescue treatment, but its effectiveness can be insufficient. We hypothesized that continuous IA nimodipine infusion (CIAN) could serve as a salvage treatment, and we evaluated its effectiveness and safety. Methods: We evaluated 274 patients with aSAH admitted between October 2017 and February 2024, identifying those who received IA nimodipine and those who also received CIAN. Characteristics of the patients, length of stay, and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at the time of discharge were compared between the conventional IA nimodipine and the CIAN groups. Results: Of the 274 patients, 15 received IA nimodipine, and five of those underwent CIAN. More females were observed in the medically refractory CVS group compared with the non-refractory group (87% [13/15] vs. 66% [171/259]), but there was no sex difference between the CIAN and conventional IA nimodipine groups. CIAN was initiated at a mean of 9 days after the onset of aSAH and continued for 21–81 hours. Two complications were noted, including severe brain edema and suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, radiological assessments showed no new lesions. The CIAN group exhibited a longer duration of abnormal findings on transcranial Doppler compared to the conventional IA group (16.0±10.1 vs. 9.4±7.9 days), as well as longer neurocritical care unit (17.4±10.1 vs. 14.1±7.0 days) and hospital stays (46.6±28.7 vs. 29.5±13.2 days). Nonetheless, more achieved a favorable outcome (mRS ≤2) in the CIAN group (80% [4/5] vs. 70% [7/10]). Conclusion: CIAN is a viable salvage treatment for refractory CVS, providing a prolonged vasodilatory effect compared to conventional IA nimodipine, with favorable outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-684
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Volume68
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Angioplasty
  • Cerebral infarction
  • Nimodipine
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Vasospasm, intracranial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of Continuous Intra-Arterial Nimodipine Infusion for the Treatment of Refractory Vasospasm after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this