TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics during simulated endotracheal intubation
T2 - A randomized controlled study
AU - Lee, Ja Eun
AU - Hong, Kwan Young
AU - Chung, Chisong
AU - Min, Jeong Jin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Purpose Excessive force during laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation can result in injury to airway soft tissues and hemodynamic stress responses. In this randomized controlled trial on simulated intubation, we aimed to evaluate the effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics. This study was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry (KCT0006948). Methods Fifty operators with varying levels of experience were enrolled to intubate an airway mannequin at two different bed heights— anterior superior iliac spine (level A) and xyphoid process (level X) of each operator—in a randomized sequence. The laryngoscopy force measured with a Pliance® pressure sensor attached to the surface of the Macintosh laryngoscopy blade, intubation characteristics, and ergonomic score based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool were compared between the two bed heights (level A vs. X). Results Peak and impulse laryngoscopy forces were significantly lower at xyphoid (level X) compared to the lower bed height (level A) (peak force: 36.06±9.77N vs. 33.74±8.69N, P=0.049; impulse force: 251.82±106.06N vs. 224.18±86.48, P=0.005). Laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade) and subjective comfort were also better at level X (P=0.0024 and P<0.001, respectively). The ergonomic score was higher at the lower bed height (level A, P<0.001), indicating a more strenuous work posture. Conclusion Bed height at xyphoid level reduced laryngoscopy force while improving laryngeal view and ergonomic comfort compared to ASIS level. Adjusting the bed height before endotracheal intubation can improve the operating environment, which in turn may contribute to safety of both patient and operator.
AB - Purpose Excessive force during laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation can result in injury to airway soft tissues and hemodynamic stress responses. In this randomized controlled trial on simulated intubation, we aimed to evaluate the effect of bed height on laryngoscopy force and operator ergonomics. This study was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry (KCT0006948). Methods Fifty operators with varying levels of experience were enrolled to intubate an airway mannequin at two different bed heights— anterior superior iliac spine (level A) and xyphoid process (level X) of each operator—in a randomized sequence. The laryngoscopy force measured with a Pliance® pressure sensor attached to the surface of the Macintosh laryngoscopy blade, intubation characteristics, and ergonomic score based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment tool were compared between the two bed heights (level A vs. X). Results Peak and impulse laryngoscopy forces were significantly lower at xyphoid (level X) compared to the lower bed height (level A) (peak force: 36.06±9.77N vs. 33.74±8.69N, P=0.049; impulse force: 251.82±106.06N vs. 224.18±86.48, P=0.005). Laryngeal view (Cormack-Lehane grade) and subjective comfort were also better at level X (P=0.0024 and P<0.001, respectively). The ergonomic score was higher at the lower bed height (level A, P<0.001), indicating a more strenuous work posture. Conclusion Bed height at xyphoid level reduced laryngoscopy force while improving laryngeal view and ergonomic comfort compared to ASIS level. Adjusting the bed height before endotracheal intubation can improve the operating environment, which in turn may contribute to safety of both patient and operator.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018398356
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0333104
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0333104
M3 - Article
C2 - 41071757
AN - SCOPUS:105018398356
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 10 October
M1 - e0333104
ER -