Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of Atorvastatin on Serial Changes in Coronary Physiology and Plaque Parameters

  • Cheol Hyun Lee
  • , Jongmin Hwang
  • , In Cheol Kim
  • , Yun Kyeong Cho
  • , Hyoung Seob Park
  • , Hyuck Jun Yoon
  • , Hyungseop Kim
  • , Seongwook Han
  • , Seung Ho Hur
  • , Kwon Bae Kim
  • , Jin Young Kim
  • , Jin Wook Chung
  • , Joo Myung Lee
  • , Joon Hyung Doh
  • , Eun Seok Shin
  • , Bon Kwon Koo
  • , Chang Wook Nam
  • Keimyung University
  • Daegu University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Inje University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Seoul National University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The effects of statin on coronary physiology have not been well evaluated. Objectives: The authors performed this prospective study to investigate changes in coronary flow indexes and plaque parameters, and their associations with atorvastatin therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Ninety-five patients with intermediate CAD who received atorvastatin therapy underwent comprehensive physiological assessments with fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and intravascular ultrasound at the index procedure, and underwent the same evaluations at 12-month follow-up. Optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was defined as LDL-C <70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction from the baseline. The primary endpoint was a change in the FFR. Results: Baseline FFR, minimal lumen area, and percent atheroma volume (PAV) were 0.88 ± 0.05, 3.87 ± 1.28, 55.92 ± 7.30, respectively. During 12 months, the percent change in LDL-C was -33.2%, whereas FFR was unchanged (0.87 ± 0.06 at 12 months; P = 0.694). Vessel area, lumen area, and PAV were significantly decreased (all P values <0.05). The achieved LDL-C level and the change of PAV showed significant inverse correlations with the change in FFR. In patients with optimally modified LDL-C, the FFR had increased (0.87 ± 0.06 vs 0.89 ± 0.07; P = 0.014) and the PAV decreased (56.81 ± 6.44% vs 55.18 ± 8.19%; P = 0.031), whereas in all other patients, the FFR had decreased (0.88 ± 0.05 vs 0.86 ± 0.06; P = 0.025) and the PAV remained unchanged. Conclusions: In patients with CAD, atorvastatin did not change FFR despite a decrease in the PAV. However, in patients who achieved the optimal LDL-C target level with atorvastatin, the FFR had significantly increased with decrease of the PAV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-703
Number of pages13
JournalJACC: Asia
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • fractional flow reserve
  • intermediate coronary artery disease
  • statin therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Atorvastatin on Serial Changes in Coronary Physiology and Plaque Parameters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this