Durvalumab in Combination With Olaparib Versus Durvalumab Alone as Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 2 ORION Study

  • Myung Ju Ahn
  • , Igor Bondarenko
  • , Ewa Kalinka
  • , Byoung Chul Cho
  • , Shunichi Sugawara
  • , Gabriella Gálffy
  • , Byoung Yong Shim
  • , Nikolay Kislov
  • , Rajnish Nagarkar
  • , Ingel Demedts
  • , Steven J.M. Gans
  • , Dolores Mendoza Oliva
  • , Ross Stewart
  • , Zhongwu Lai
  • , Helen Mann
  • , Xiaojin Shi
  • , Maen Hussein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Increased DNA damage triggered through poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition may modify tumor immunogenicity, sensitizing tumors to immunotherapy. ORION (NCT03775486) evaluated the combination of olaparib with durvalumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Methods: ORION is a phase 2, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, international study. Patients with metastatic NSCLC (without activating EGFR or ALK aberrations) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled to receive initial therapy with durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously; every 3 wk) plus platinum-based chemotherapy for four cycles. Patients without disease progression were then randomized (1:1) to maintenance durvalumab (1500 mg; every 4 wk) plus either olaparib (300 mg orally) or placebo (both twice daily); randomization was stratified by objective response during initial therapy and tumor histologic type. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1). Results: Between January 2019 and February 2020, 269 of 401 patients who received initial therapy were randomized. As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up: 9.6 mo), median PFS was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval: 5.3–7.9) with durvalumab plus olaparib versus 5.3 months (3.7–5.8) with durvalumab plus placebo (hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.57–1.02, p = 0.074). Safety findings were consistent with the known profiles of durvalumab and olaparib. Anemia was the most common adverse event (AE) with durvalumab plus olaparib (26.1% versus 8.2% with durvalumab plus placebo). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs (34.3% versus 17.9%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (10.4% versus 4.5%) was numerically higher with durvalumab plus olaparib versus durvalumab plus placebo. Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with durvalumab in combination with olaparib was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus durvalumab alone, although numerical improvement was observed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1594-1606
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Durvalumab
  • Immunotherapy
  • NSCLC
  • Olaparib
  • PARP inhibition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Durvalumab in Combination With Olaparib Versus Durvalumab Alone as Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic NSCLC: The Phase 2 ORION Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this