Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that individuals’ help-seeking behavior increases when a computerized helper is endowed with humanlike features in nonachievement contexts. In contrast, the current research suggests that anthropomorphic helpers are not universally conducive to help-seeking behavior in contexts of achievement, particularly among individuals who construe help seeking as a display of incompetence (i.e., entity theorists). Study 1 demonstrated that when entity theorists received help from an anthropomorphized (vs. a nonanthropomorphized) helper, they were more concerned about negative judgments from other people, whereas incremental theorists were not affected by anthropomorphic features. Study 2 showed that when help was provided by an anthropomorphized (vs. a nonanthropomorphized) helper, entity theorists were less likely to seek help, even at the cost of lower performance. In contrast, incremental theorists’ help-seeking behavior and task performance were not affected by anthropomorphism. This research deepens the current understanding of the role of anthropomorphic computerized helpers in online learning contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 171-180 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Psychological Science |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Feb 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- anthropomorphism
- help seeking
- online learning
- open data
- open materials
- task performance
- theories of intelligence