Does c-Met remain a rational target for therapy in patients with EGFR TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer?

Yi Long Wu, Ross Andrew Soo, Giuseppe Locatelli, Uz Stammberger, Giorgio Scagliotti, Keunchil Park

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

75 Scopus citations

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) inevitably develops resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. In 5–20% of cases, this can be attributed to aberrant c-Met activity, providing a clear rationale for the use of c-Met inhibitors in these patients. EGFR TKI-resistant tumors often remain sensitive to EGFR signaling, such that c-Met inhibitors are likely to be most effective when combined with continued EGFR TKI therapy. The phase III trials of the c–Met inhibitors onartuzumab and tivantinib, which failed to demonstrate significant benefit in patients with NSCLC but excluded patients with EGFR TKI-resistant disease, do not allow c-Met to be dismissed as a rational target in EGFR TKI-resistant NSCLC. Selective c-Met TKIs exhibit more favorable properties, targeting both hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-dependent and -independent c-Met activity, with a reduced risk of toxicity compared to non-selective c-Met TKIs. Phase Ib/II trials of the selective c-Met TKIs capmatinib and tepotinib have shown encouraging signs of efficacy. Factors affecting the success of ongoing and future trials of c-Met inhibitors in patients with EGFR TKI-resistant, c-Met-positive NSCLC are considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-81
Number of pages12
JournalCancer Treatment Reviews
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • EGFR resistance
  • NSCLC
  • Tepotinib

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does c-Met remain a rational target for therapy in patients with EGFR TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this