Abstract
The authors regret the need to make a minor modification to the manuscript. Specifically, we asked for the removal of Fig. 1 from the manuscript. This appears early in the manuscript. The Figure was misplaced due to a miscommunication in the proofing process and should have been in the Appendix. Since the Figure simply replicates our analysis which is available in Table form in the main body of the text, we had simply asked to have the Figure removed to prevent further complications or confusion. This does not alter any of the paper's theory, exposition, or results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102875 |
| Journal | Electoral Studies |
| Volume | 92 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Dec 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Sorry not Sorry: Presentational strategies and the electoral punishment of corruption” [Elect. Stud. 92 (2024): 102867](S0261379424001252)(10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102867)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver