Correlation of perfusion index change and analgesic efficacy in transforaminal block for lumbosacral radicular pain

Jin Young Lee, Eung Don Kim, Yoo Na Kim, Ji Seob Kim, Woo Seog Sim, Hae Jin Lee, Hyun Joon Park, Hue Jung Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transforaminal epidural injection is used to treat radicular pain. However, there is no objective method of assessing pain relief following transforaminal injection. Perfusion index is a metric for monitoring peripheral perfusion status. This study evaluates the correlation between perfusion index change and analgesic efficacy in transforaminal blocks for lumbosacral radicular pain. We retrospectively analyzed data of 100 patients receiving transforaminal block for lumbosacral radicular pain. We assessed perfusion index before treatment and at 5, 15, and 30 min following the block. We defined responders (group R) and non-responders (group N) as those with ≥50% and <50% pain reduction, respectively, 30 min following block. Clinical data and perfusion index of the groups were analyzed. Ninety-two patients were examined, of whom 57 (61.9%) and 35 (38.0%) patients reported ≥50% and <50% pain reduction, respectively. Group R had a significantly higher perfusion index change ratio 5 min following the block (p = 0.029). A perfusion index change ratio of ≥0.27 was observed in group R (sensitivity, 75.4%; specificity, 51.4%; AUC (area under the curve), 0.636; p = 0.032). A perfusion index change ratio of ≥0.27 at 5 min after block is associated with, but does not predict improvement in, pain levels following lumbosacral transforaminal block.

Original languageEnglish
Article number51
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Change ratio
  • Perfusion index
  • Radicular pain
  • Transforaminal block

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correlation of perfusion index change and analgesic efficacy in transforaminal block for lumbosacral radicular pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this