Correction to: Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0)

Jaeryung Kim; Sung Ho Choi; Dong Hui Lim; Gil Joong Yoon; Tae Young Chung

doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01753-x

Correction to: Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0)

Jaeryung Kim
, Sung Ho Choi
, Dong Hui Lim
, Gil Joong Yoon
, Tae Young Chung

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Following publication of the original article [1], we were notified that the paper confirmed a previous study by Wallerstein et al. [2] and that this study was not cited in the published manuscript. The citation is included below. Original: Our results showed that the predictability of the refractive correction and visual outcomes did not differ significantly among WFO-, manifest TG-, and TMR-LASIK, similar with those of previous contralateral-eye comparisons of WFO-LASIK with manifest TG- or TMR-LASIK [3–5]. However, in this study, the mean value of postoperative RA was higher in TMR-LASIK, and TMR-LASIK showed a significantly-skewed distribution of postoperative RA toward higher astigmatic values than WFO- and manifest TGLASIK. On the other hand, a previous comparison between WFO- and TMR-LASIK reported conflicting results with respect to RA [5].

Original language	English
Article number	492
Journal	BMC Ophthalmology
Volume	20
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01753-x
State	Published - Dec 2020
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1186/s12886-020-01753-x

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{0c88b913d2ea410d975e03981da74d32,

title = "Correction to: Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0)",

abstract = "Following publication of the original article [1], we were notified that the paper confirmed a previous study by Wallerstein et al. [2] and that this study was not cited in the published manuscript. The citation is included below. Original: Our results showed that the predictability of the refractive correction and visual outcomes did not differ significantly among WFO-, manifest TG-, and TMR-LASIK, similar with those of previous contralateral-eye comparisons of WFO-LASIK with manifest TG- or TMR-LASIK [3–5]. However, in this study, the mean value of postoperative RA was higher in TMR-LASIK, and TMR-LASIK showed a significantly-skewed distribution of postoperative RA toward higher astigmatic values than WFO- and manifest TGLASIK. On the other hand, a previous comparison between WFO- and TMR-LASIK reported conflicting results with respect to RA [5].",

author = "Jaeryung Kim and Choi, \{Sung Ho\} and Lim, \{Dong Hui\} and Yoon, \{Gil Joong\} and Chung, \{Tae Young\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, The Author(s).",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1186/s12886-020-01753-x",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

journal = "BMC Ophthalmology",

issn = "1471-2415",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd",

number = "1",

}

Correction to: Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0). / Kim, Jaeryung; Choi, Sung Ho; Lim, Dong Hui et al.
In: BMC Ophthalmology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 492, 12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0)

AU - Kim, Jaeryung

AU - Choi, Sung Ho

AU - Lim, Dong Hui

AU - Yoon, Gil Joong

AU - Chung, Tae Young

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Following publication of the original article [1], we were notified that the paper confirmed a previous study by Wallerstein et al. [2] and that this study was not cited in the published manuscript. The citation is included below. Original: Our results showed that the predictability of the refractive correction and visual outcomes did not differ significantly among WFO-, manifest TG-, and TMR-LASIK, similar with those of previous contralateral-eye comparisons of WFO-LASIK with manifest TG- or TMR-LASIK [3–5]. However, in this study, the mean value of postoperative RA was higher in TMR-LASIK, and TMR-LASIK showed a significantly-skewed distribution of postoperative RA toward higher astigmatic values than WFO- and manifest TGLASIK. On the other hand, a previous comparison between WFO- and TMR-LASIK reported conflicting results with respect to RA [5].

AB - Following publication of the original article [1], we were notified that the paper confirmed a previous study by Wallerstein et al. [2] and that this study was not cited in the published manuscript. The citation is included below. Original: Our results showed that the predictability of the refractive correction and visual outcomes did not differ significantly among WFO-, manifest TG-, and TMR-LASIK, similar with those of previous contralateral-eye comparisons of WFO-LASIK with manifest TG- or TMR-LASIK [3–5]. However, in this study, the mean value of postoperative RA was higher in TMR-LASIK, and TMR-LASIK showed a significantly-skewed distribution of postoperative RA toward higher astigmatic values than WFO- and manifest TGLASIK. On the other hand, a previous comparison between WFO- and TMR-LASIK reported conflicting results with respect to RA [5].

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85098261220

U2 - 10.1186/s12886-020-01753-x

DO - 10.1186/s12886-020-01753-x

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 33372587

AN - SCOPUS:85098261220

SN - 1471-2415

VL - 20

JO - BMC Ophthalmology

JF - BMC Ophthalmology

IS - 1

M1 - 492

ER -

Correction to: Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK (BMC Ophthalmology, (2020), 20, 1, (192), 10.1186/s12886-020-01459-0)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this