Comparison of therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shock wave in calcific versus noncalcific lateral epicondylopathy

Jong Wook Park, Ji Hye Hwang, Yoo Seong Choi, Sang Jun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in lateral epicondylopathy with calcification, and compare it to the effect of ESWT in lateral epicondylopathy without calcification. Methods A retrospective study was conducted. Forty-three patients (19 with calcific and 24 with noncalcific lateral epicondylopathy in ultrasound imaging) were included. Clinical evaluations included the 100-point score, Nirschl Pain Phase scale before and after ESWT, and Roles and Maudsley (R&M) scores after ESWT. ESWT (2,000 impulses and 0.06-0.12 mJ/mm2) was performed once a week for 4 weeks. Results The 100-point score and Nirschl Pain Phase scale changed significantly over time (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups (p=0.555). The R&M scores at 3 and 6 months after ESWT were not significantly different between groups. In the presence of a tendon tear, those in the calcific lateral epicondylopathy group showed poor improvement of 100-point scores compared to the noncalcific group (p=0.004). Conclusion This study demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of ESWT in calcific lateral epicondylopathy was not significantly different from that in noncalcific lateral epicondylopathy. When a tendon tear is present, patients with calcific lateral epicondylopathy might show poor prognosis after ESWT relative to patients with noncalcific lateral epicondylopathy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-300
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Epicondylitis
  • Extracorporeal shockwave

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shock wave in calcific versus noncalcific lateral epicondylopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this