Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Jung Soo Kim
  • , Jinkyeong Park
  • , Seong Yong Lim
  • , Yeon Mok Oh
  • , Kwang Ha Yoo
  • , Yong Bum Park
  • , Seung Soo Sheen
  • , Min Ji Kim
  • , K. C. Carriere
  • , Ji Ye Jung
  • , Hye Yun Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Two once-daily inhaled bronchodilators, indacaterol and tiotropium, are widely used as firstline therapy in stable COPD patients. This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1) at week 12. Four RCTs were eligible for inclusion (three RCTs with moderate-to-severe COPD patients and one RCT with only severe COPD patients). Trough FEV1 at weeks 12 and 26 were not significantly different between indacaterol and tiotropium by the standardized mean difference with 0.014 (95% CI, -0.036, 0.063, I2= 23.5%) and with 0.037 (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.133, I2= 0%) along with differences in means of 0.003L and 0.014L, respectively. Indacaterol and tiotropium also showed similar St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores and percentages of patients with SGRQ improvement (-≥ 4 units) at week 26. The incidences of nasopharyngitis, serious cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events were not different between indacaterol and tiotropium, while those of cough (OR = 1.68, P < 0.001, and RR = 1.63) and COPD worsening (OR = 1.18, P = 0.003, and RR = 1.12) were higher for indacaterol than tiotropium. However, when one study with only severe COPD patients was removed from the meta-analysis, the difference in the incidence of COPD worsening between indacaterol and tiotropium became non-significant (OR = 1.13, P = 0.204, and RR = 1.09). The clinical efficacy and serious adverse events between indacaterol and tiotropium were equivocal in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Cough is a common complaint associated with indacaterol, and COPD worsening needs to be carefully monitored in severe COPD patients when treated with indacaterol.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0119948
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this