Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes of Triple (Aspirin + Clopidogrel + Cilostazol) Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Aspirin + Clopidogrel + Placebo) After Implantation of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents into One or More Coronary Arteries: from the DECREASE-PCI Trial

  • Cheol Hyun Lee
  • , Jong Young Lee
  • , Gyung Min Park
  • , Seung Whan Lee
  • , Hyun Sook Kim
  • , Young Jin Choi
  • , Chang Wook Nam
  • , Jang Hyun Cho
  • , Won Yong Shin
  • , Jae Bin Seo
  • , Si Wan Choi
  • , Jae Hwan Lee
  • , Pil Ki Min
  • , Sung Ho Her
  • , Pil Hyung Lee
  • , Jung Min Ahn
  • , Duk Woo Park
  • , Soo Jin Kang
  • , Young Hak Kim
  • , Cheol Whan Lee
  • Seong Wook Park, Seung Jung Park
  • University of Ulsan
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
  • Hallym University
  • Sejong General Hospital
  • Keimyung University
  • St Carollo Hospital
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Seoul National University
  • Chungnam National University
  • Yonsei University
  • The Catholic University of Korea

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the impact of triple antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes in patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) for coronary artery disease. There are limited data regarding the impact of triple antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent implantation of second-generation DES. We planned to randomly assign 2,110 patients treated with second-generation DES to triple (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol) and dual (aspirin, clopidogrel, and placebo) antiplatelet therapy groups. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year since randomization. The study was stopped early owing to slow enrollment. In total, 404 patients (202 patients each in the triple and dual antiplatelet therapy groups) were finally enrolled. At 1 year, the primary end point had occurred in 3.6% and 9.4% of patients in the triple and dual antiplatelet therapy groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] of the triple group 0.396; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.166 to 0.949; p = 0.038). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the occurrence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (HR 0.583; 95% CI 0.229 to 1.481; p = 0.256). However, the rates of TVR were significantly lower in the triple antiplatelet therapy group than in the dual antiplatelet therapy group (HR 0.118; 95% CI 0.015 to 0.930; p = 0.043). In conclusion, triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol after implantation of second-generation DES improved clinical outcomes, mainly by reducing TVR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-429
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume121
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes of Triple (Aspirin + Clopidogrel + Cilostazol) Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Aspirin + Clopidogrel + Placebo) After Implantation of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents into One or More Coronary Arteries: from the DECREASE-PCI Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this