Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative study between PLGA and dermal tissue for tracheal regeneration

  • Jin Hoon Kim
  • , Ho Joong Kim
  • , Jhingook Kim
  • , Won Ho Kong
  • , Soo Won Seo
  • Sungkyunkwan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Various kinds of biomaterials that have biocompatibility and biodegradability have been used for the tissue engineered organ reconstruction. Their characteristics have relationship with functional and morphological reconstruction. However, it is not clear which types of biomaterials provide the best outcomes after transplantation. For the reason, in this study, to compare synthetic biomaterial and natural biomaterial, we developed two kinds of patches to compare affects of biomaterials for cell transplantation and organ reconstruction. The one was coated with PLGA sheet and the other was coated with autologous dermal sheet. Cultured PKH26-labeled cells were seeded on the patches and then the patches were transplanted onto tracheas. After three months, we found that each biomaterial had a different tracheal reconstruction pattern: the PLGA patch was suited for airway patency(tracheal passage with stable inside diameter for air exchange) but not for epithelial layer reconstruction whereas the dermal patch was suited for epithelial layer reconstruction but not for airway patency. Consequently, while selecting biomaterials for transplantation and reconstruction, not only their biological effects on the body but also their effects on organ morphology and function should be considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-315
Number of pages7
JournalTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2010

Keywords

  • Biomaterials
  • PKH26
  • Tissue engineering
  • Trachea
  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study between PLGA and dermal tissue for tracheal regeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this