Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of nitrogen removal in moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) treating anaerobic digestion effluent: effect of external carbon source and biocarrier autopsy

  • Sungkyunkwan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated nitrogen removal performance in an anoxic/oxic moving bed biofilm reactor (A/O MBBR) using two external carbon sources: food waste condensate (FWC) and methanol (MeOH). FWC supported effective denitrification (95.4 ± 4.2 %) due to the enrichment of diverse heterotrophic denitrifiers, including Thauera, Paracoccus, and Azospira, despite its chemical complexity. However, nitrification efficiency in the FWC-fed system was lower than in the MeOH-fed system (5.5 % lower), likely due to inhibitory organic constituents and fewer nitrifying bacteria (Nitrosomonas and Nitrolancea). In contrast, the MeOH-fed system achieved higher nitrification efficiency (97.7 ± 2.9 %) and stable biofilm formation. Despite the limitations of MeOH's substrate diversity, FWC proved to be a viable, sustainable carbon source for nitrogen removal in A/O MBBR systems. Future research should focus on enhancing nitrification through microbial enrichment and process optimization to achieve balanced nitrogen removal under complex substrate conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number133175
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume437
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • Biocarrier
  • Biological wastewater treatment
  • Denitrification
  • Food waste condensate
  • Nitrification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of nitrogen removal in moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) treating anaerobic digestion effluent: effect of external carbon source and biocarrier autopsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this