Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With or Without Chronic Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study

  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Yonsei University
  • Seoul National University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Although the effectiveness and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel may differ in patients with chronic liver disease, there is a scarcity of evidence comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with chronic liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding associated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to acute coronary syndrome by chronic liver disease status. Methods: Using the Korean healthcare claim database, we included adult patients who underwent PCI and initiated ticagrelor or clopidogrel treatment within 7 days of an acute coronary syndrome diagnosis. Patients were classified into 2 mutually exclusive groups: patients with chronic liver disease and patients without chronic liver disease. Within each group, the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of MACE and major bleeding associated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model within a 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched cohort. Results: The final cohort included 14,261 and 148,535 patients with and without chronic liver disease, respectively. After PS matching, the risk of MACE (with chronic liver disease, HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.91-1.13; without chronic liver disease, HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.98-1.05; P for homogeneity: 0.865) and major bleeding (with chronic liver disease, HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.71-1.61; without chronic liver disease, HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15-1.53; P for homogeneity: 0.342) for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel do not vary with chronic liver disease status. Conclusions: Among acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI, the use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel was associated with a similar risk of MACE and an increased risk of major bleeding, but these risks did not vary with chronic liver disease status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-750.e11
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume137
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Chronic liver disease
  • Clopidogrel
  • Population-based cohort study
  • Ticagrelor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With or Without Chronic Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this