Comparative analysis of salt cleaning and osmotic backwash on calcium-bridged organic fouling in nanofiltration process

Hyunsu Lee, Sung Ju Im, Hyeonho Lee, Chang Min Kim, Am Jang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

The cleaning efficiency of salt cleaning and osmotic backwash in a nanofiltration (NF) process is evaluated using model organic foulants in the presence of calcium ions (Ca2+). In particular, the organic fouling behavior—which depends on Ca2+ concentration—and cleaning mechanism in both salt cleaning and osmotic backwash are studied. The results show that Ca2+ aggravates organic fouling, and the fouling formation rate is affected by the Ca2+/foulant ratio. Salt cleaning and osmotic backwash effectively clean Ca2+-bridging fouling, and the important cleaning mechanism in both methods is ion-exchange between the monovalent and divalent cations, resulting in the breakup of Ca2+–foulant binding and Ca2+-induced intermolecular bridging. The cleaning efficiency of osmotic backwash is 26% higher than that of salt cleaning, primarily owing to that the backwash flux creates synergy effect with ion-exchange to removes the weakened fouling structure on the membrane surface. In addition, the cleaning efficiency for irreversible fouling is of the order of osmotic backwash > chemical cleaning > salt cleaning, and osmotic backwash exhibited a 7.3% and 20.8% higher cleaning efficiency than chemical cleaning and salt cleaning, respectively. Therefore, osmotic backwash can stably maintain NF membrane performance for organic fouling and potentially replace the traditional chemical cleaning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115022
JournalDesalination
Volume507
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Membrane cleaning
  • Nanofiltration
  • Organic fouling
  • Osmotic backwash
  • Salt cleaning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of salt cleaning and osmotic backwash on calcium-bridged organic fouling in nanofiltration process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this