Comorbidity in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general female population

  • Dong Wook Shin
  • , Joo Hyun Nam
  • , Yong Chul Kwon
  • , Sang Yoon Park
  • , Duk Soo Bae
  • , Chong Taik Park
  • , Chi Heum Cho
  • , Jong Min Lee
  • , Sang Min Park
  • , Young Ho Yun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of comorbidities in cervical cancer survivors compared with the general population and to identify risk factors and impact on their quality of life (QoL). Methods: 860 female cervical cancer survivors enrolled at six tertiary hospitals and 994 women from the general population were surveyed on current comorbidities and QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24). Results: Compared with the general female population, the cervical cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of comorbidities (0.93 ± 2.91 vs. 0.37 ± 0.67, p < 0.01), significantly more heart disease (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38-5.07), liver disease (aOR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.54-7.02), hypertension (aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.30-2.27), gastrointestinal disease (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.37-2.33) and musculoskeletal disease (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.45-2.59). Heart and renal disease significantly influenced QoL in many subscales. Patients with diabetes or cerebrovascular disease had an increased likelihood of sexual problems. Conclusions: The cervical cancer survivors had more comorbidities than the general population, and that in turn affected their QoL. Vigilant follow-up of comorbidities should be incorporated into in the care of cancer survivors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-215
Number of pages9
JournalOncology (Switzerland)
Volume74
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • Comorbidity
  • Disease-free survivor
  • Quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comorbidity in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general female population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this