Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of single primary or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 cm)

Byung Gon Na, Jong Man Kim, Dong Kyu Oh, Kyo Won Lee, Tae Wook Kang, Gyu Seong Choi, Min Woo Lee, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Hyun Chul Lim, Jae Won Joh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has some limitations such as poor sonic window and injury to adjacent organs. The laparoscopic approach has been suggested as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to show the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic RFA for single, small (≤3 cm), and primary or recurrent HCC that is not suitable for percutaneous RFA or surgical resection. Methods: We reviewed the cases of 37 patients (32 men and 5 women, mean age 61 ± 8.1 years) who underwent laparoscopic RFA for single, small HCC (≤3 cm) that was unsuitable for percutaneous RFA or surgical resection. Results: The technical success rate was 94.6% and 34 patients (95%) had no complications. There were no conversions to open RFA and no operative mortality. The primary effectiveness rate 1 month after the procedure was 100%. The overall recurrence rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the laparoscopic RFA were 8.1%, 14.4%, 25%, and 35.7%, respectively. The local tumor progression rate was 4.2% at 6 months and 8.7% at 9 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic RFA is a safe and effective treatment for HCC cases that are unsuitable for percutaneous RFA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-360
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Surgical Treatment and Research
Volume92
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2017

Keywords

  • Catheter ablation
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Laparoscopy
  • Local neoplasm recurrence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of single primary or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 cm)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this