Clinical outcomes of complications following selfexpandable metallic stent insertion for benign tracheobronchial stenosis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The use of metallic stents in benign TBS is controversial. Here, we report the clinical outcomes of patients who developed complications due to self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for benign TBS. Materials and Methods: Our institution, which is the largest and most active referral hospital for airway stenosis in South Korea, only uses silicone stents. We conducted a retrospective review of 20 patients referred after the insertion of SEMS for benign TBS from 2006 to 2015. Results: All 20 patients underwent rigid bronchoscopy for SEMS removal due to airway obstruction from granulation tissue overgrowth. All but one (95%) experienced successful removal of the SEMS. During a median follow-up period of 40 months, a median of seven rigid bronchoscopies per patient was needed to maintain airway patency. Three (15%) patients suffered acute complications during SEMS removal (bleeding (10%) and fistula (5%)). All patients suffered chronic complications (granulation tissue (80%), stent migration (58%), mucostasis (55%), and restenosis (43%)). Eventually, 15 patients (75%) needed airway prostheses (silicone stent (75%) and tracheostomy (25%)). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that SEMS should be avoided until positive results are consistently reported by high-quality studies in patients with benign TBS.

Original languageEnglish
Article number367
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalMedicina (Lithuania)
Volume56
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Benign tracheobronchial stenosis
  • Metallic stent
  • Silicone stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes of complications following selfexpandable metallic stent insertion for benign tracheobronchial stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this