Clinical implication of transaortic mitral pannus removal during repeat cardiac surgery for patients with mechanical mitral valve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transaortic mitral pannus removal (TMPR). Methods and Results: Between 2004 and 2016, 34 patients (median age, 57 years; 30 women) with rheumatic disease underwent pannus removal on the ventricular side of a mechanical mitral valve through the aortic valve during reoperation. The median time interval from the previous surgery was 14 years. TMPR was performed after removal of the mechanical aortic valve (n=21) or diseased native aortic valve (n=11). TMPR was performed in 2 patients through a normal aortic valve. The mitral transprosthetic mean pressure gradient (TMPG) was ≥5 mmHg in 11 patients, including 3 with prosthetic valve malfunction. Prophylactic TMPR was performed in 23 patients. There were no early deaths. Concomitant operations included 22 tricuspid valve surgeries (13 replacements, 15 repairs) and 32 aortic valve replacements (24 repeats, 8 primary). The mean gradient in patients who had mitral TMPG ≥5 mmHg was significantly decreased from 6.46±1.1 to 4.37±1.17 mmHg at discharge (P<0.001). No mechanical valve malfunction was apparent on last echocardiography. Conclusions: TMPR is a safe and effective procedure for patients with malfunction or stenosis of a mechanical mitral valve and may be considered an alternative approach in patients with pannus overgrowth in such valves.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-402
Number of pages7
JournalCirculation Journal
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Mitral valve
  • Prosthesis
  • Rheumatic heart disease
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical implication of transaortic mitral pannus removal during repeat cardiac surgery for patients with mechanical mitral valve'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this