TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics and Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Categorized as LR-M
T2 - Comparison with Those Categorized as LR-4 or 5
AU - Shin, Jaeseung
AU - Lee, Sunyoung
AU - Kim, Seung seob
AU - Chung, Yong Eun
AU - Choi, Jin Young
AU - Park, Mi Suk
AU - Kim, Myeong Jin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: According to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the LI-RADS category M (LR-M), which are probably or definitely malignant but are not specific for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), does not exclude HCCs. A gap in knowledge remains, including their characteristics and recurrence of HCCs categorized as LR-M. Purpose: To compare the characteristics of HCCs categorized as LR-M with HCCs categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 (LR-4/5) using the LI-RADS version 2018 and evaluate the relationship of these categories with the risk of early recurrence after curative resections of single HCCs. Study Type: Retrospective. Subjects: Two hundred and eighty-one patients (mean age, 57 years; 191 men and 90 women) who underwent curative resections for single HCCs and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI between 2015 and 2017. Field Strength/Sequence: 3T Dual gradient-echo T1WI with in- and opposed-phase, turbo spin-echo T2WI, diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and three-dimensional gradient-echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent. Assessment: MRI features according to the LI-RADS version 2018 were evaluated and LI-RADS category were assigned for each observation. Clinical, imaging, and histopathological features were compared based on LI-RADS categorization. Early recurrence rates (<2 years) and associated factors were also evaluated. Statistical Tests: Fisher's exact test, two-sample t test after satisfying assumption of normality through Shapiro–Wilk test, Fleiss κ coefficient, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier method, and log-rank test. Results: Forty-one HCCs (14.6%) were categorized as LR-M and 240 HCCs (85.4%) were categorized as LR-4/5. LR-M HCCs showed poorer differentiation than LR-4/5 HCCs. In the multivariate analysis, the LR-M category was an independent predictor for early recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.024–3.542; P < 0.05). Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with LR-M HCCs than in patients with LR-4/5 HCCs (32.0% vs. 18.4%, respectively, P < 0 05). Data Conclusion: Compared to LR-4/5 HCCs, LR-M HCCs were associated with poorer tumor differentiation and higher early recurrence rates after curative resections of single HCCs. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.
AB - Background: According to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the LI-RADS category M (LR-M), which are probably or definitely malignant but are not specific for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), does not exclude HCCs. A gap in knowledge remains, including their characteristics and recurrence of HCCs categorized as LR-M. Purpose: To compare the characteristics of HCCs categorized as LR-M with HCCs categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 (LR-4/5) using the LI-RADS version 2018 and evaluate the relationship of these categories with the risk of early recurrence after curative resections of single HCCs. Study Type: Retrospective. Subjects: Two hundred and eighty-one patients (mean age, 57 years; 191 men and 90 women) who underwent curative resections for single HCCs and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI between 2015 and 2017. Field Strength/Sequence: 3T Dual gradient-echo T1WI with in- and opposed-phase, turbo spin-echo T2WI, diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and three-dimensional gradient-echo T1WI before and after administration of contrast agent. Assessment: MRI features according to the LI-RADS version 2018 were evaluated and LI-RADS category were assigned for each observation. Clinical, imaging, and histopathological features were compared based on LI-RADS categorization. Early recurrence rates (<2 years) and associated factors were also evaluated. Statistical Tests: Fisher's exact test, two-sample t test after satisfying assumption of normality through Shapiro–Wilk test, Fleiss κ coefficient, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier method, and log-rank test. Results: Forty-one HCCs (14.6%) were categorized as LR-M and 240 HCCs (85.4%) were categorized as LR-4/5. LR-M HCCs showed poorer differentiation than LR-4/5 HCCs. In the multivariate analysis, the LR-M category was an independent predictor for early recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.024–3.542; P < 0.05). Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with LR-M HCCs than in patients with LR-4/5 HCCs (32.0% vs. 18.4%, respectively, P < 0 05). Data Conclusion: Compared to LR-4/5 HCCs, LR-M HCCs were associated with poorer tumor differentiation and higher early recurrence rates after curative resections of single HCCs. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy Stage: 2.
KW - diagnosis
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - prognosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85104785235
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.27650
DO - 10.1002/jmri.27650
M3 - Article
C2 - 33891790
AN - SCOPUS:85104785235
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 54
SP - 1446
EP - 1454
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 5
ER -