Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial

  • Kazuomi Kario
  • , Yoshiaki Yokoi
  • , Keisuke Okamura
  • , Masahiko Fujihara
  • , Yukako Ogoyama
  • , Eiichiro Yamamoto
  • , Hidenori Urata
  • , Jin Man Cho
  • , Chong Jin Kim
  • , Seung Hyuk Choi
  • , Keisuke Shinohara
  • , Yasushi Mukai
  • , Tomokazu Ikemoto
  • , Masato Nakamura
  • , Shuichi Seki
  • , Satoaki Matoba
  • , Yoshisato Shibata
  • , Shigeo Sugawara
  • , Kazuhiko Yumoto
  • , Kouichi Tamura
  • Fumiki Yoshihara, Satoko Nakamura, Woong Chol Kang, Taro Shibasaki, Keigo Dote, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Akiko Matsuo, Hiroshi Fujita, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Hyun Jae Kang, Yasushi Sakata, Kazunori Horie, Naoto Inoue, Ken ichiro Sasaki, Takafumi Ueno, Hirofumi Tomita, Yoshihiro Morino, Yuhei Nojima, Chan Joon Kim, Tomoaki Matsumoto, Hisashi Kai, Shinsuke Nanto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Abstract: Renal denervation is a promising new non-pharmacological treatment for resistant hypertension. However, there is a lack of data from Asian patients. The REQUIRE trial investigated the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation in treated patients with resistant hypertension from Japan and South Korea. Adults with resistant hypertension (seated office blood pressure ≥150/90 mmHg and 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg) with suitable renal artery anatomy were randomized to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months. A total of 143 patients were included (72 renal denervation, 71 sham control). Reduction from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months was not significantly different between the renal denervation (−6.6 mmHg) and sham control (−6.5 mmHg) groups (difference: −0.1, 95% confidence interval −5.5, 5.3; p = 0.971). Reductions from baseline in home and office systolic blood pressure (differences: –1.8 mmHg [p = 0.488] and −2.0 mmHg [p = 0.511], respectively), and medication load, did not differ significantly between the two groups. The procedure-/device-related major adverse events was not seen. This study did not show a significant difference in ambulatory blood pressure reductions between renal denervation and a sham procedure in treated patients with resistant hypertension. Although blood pressure reduction after renal denervation was similar to other sham-controlled studies, the sham group in this study showed much greater reduction. This unexpected blood pressure reduction in the sham control group highlights study design issues that will be addressed in a new trial. Clinical trial registration: NCT02918305 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-231
Number of pages11
JournalHypertension Research
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Ambulatory blood pressure
  • Hypertension
  • Renal denervation
  • Sham procedure
  • Systolic blood pressure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this