TY - JOUR
T1 - Capturing Polar and Nonpolar Particles with an Electroadhesive Device Using Interfacial and Orientational Polarization
AU - Choi, Kisuk
AU - Chung, June Young
AU - Park, In Kyung
AU - Kim, Na Yeon
AU - Suhr, Jonghwan
AU - Nam, Jae Do
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2021/10/4
Y1 - 2021/10/4
N2 - Many air filtration technologies have been used to solve the environmental issues of fine and ultrafine dust particles, which have been raised over the past decades. Many other filtration technologies have been developed, while high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA) is widely used recently due to its high efficiency. However, the HEPA filter has some limitations, such as high pressure drop, nonrecyclability, and most importantly, short lifetime. Regarding other types of air filters, electrostatic filters require a two-stage process (i.e., charging and polarization) of particles before filtration, whereas electroadhesion air filters could capture both polar and nonpolar particles without a two-stage process. The dust-holding capacity allows the quantitative analysis of the areal adhesion amount to be conducted. In this study, three different kinds of particles of fine dust, microcrystalline cellulose, and Teflon were tested. A model equation of the areal adhesion amount was also developed as a function of boundary edge length, voltage, and the dielectric constant of each material and allowed the areal adhesion amount of fine dust particles to be maximized, which is well above those of the HEPA filter and electrostatic filter. The optical images clearly showed that the dielectric polarization of polar particles was stronger than that of nonpolar particles.
AB - Many air filtration technologies have been used to solve the environmental issues of fine and ultrafine dust particles, which have been raised over the past decades. Many other filtration technologies have been developed, while high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA) is widely used recently due to its high efficiency. However, the HEPA filter has some limitations, such as high pressure drop, nonrecyclability, and most importantly, short lifetime. Regarding other types of air filters, electrostatic filters require a two-stage process (i.e., charging and polarization) of particles before filtration, whereas electroadhesion air filters could capture both polar and nonpolar particles without a two-stage process. The dust-holding capacity allows the quantitative analysis of the areal adhesion amount to be conducted. In this study, three different kinds of particles of fine dust, microcrystalline cellulose, and Teflon were tested. A model equation of the areal adhesion amount was also developed as a function of boundary edge length, voltage, and the dielectric constant of each material and allowed the areal adhesion amount of fine dust particles to be maximized, which is well above those of the HEPA filter and electrostatic filter. The optical images clearly showed that the dielectric polarization of polar particles was stronger than that of nonpolar particles.
KW - areal adhesion amount
KW - dust-holding capacity
KW - electroadhesion
KW - electroadhesive device
KW - fine dust particles
KW - interfacial (induced) polarization
KW - polar and nonpolar particles
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85116661332
U2 - 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04887
DO - 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04887
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85116661332
SN - 2168-0485
VL - 9
SP - 13367
EP - 13375
JO - ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
JF - ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
IS - 39
ER -