Calibrating the impressed anodic current density for accelerated galvanostatic testing to simulate the long-term corrosion behavior of buried pipeline

Yoon Sik So, Min Sung Hong, Jeong Min Lim, Woo Cheol Kim, Jung Gu Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Various studies have been conducted to better understand the long-term corrosion mechanism for steels in a soil environment. Here, electrochemical acceleration methods present the most efficient way to simulate long-term corrosion. Among the various methods, galvanostatic testing allows for accelerating the surface corrosion reactions through controlling the impressed anodic current density. However, a large deviation from the equilibrium state can induce different corrosion mechanisms to those in actual service. Therefore, applying a suitable anodic current density is important for shortening the test times and maintaining the stable dissolution of steel. In this paper, to calibrate the anodic current density, galvanostatic tests were performed at four different levels of anodic current density and time to accelerate a one-year corrosion reaction of pipeline steel. To validate the appropriate anodic current density, analysis of the potential vs. time curves, thermodynamic analysis, and analysis of the specimen’s cross-sections and products were conducted using a validation algorithm. The results indicated that 0.96 mA/cm2 was the optimal impressed anodic current density in terms of a suitable polarized potential, uniform corrosion, and a valid corrosion product among the evaluated conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2100
JournalMaterials
Volume14
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2021

Keywords

  • Carbon steel
  • Galvanostatic test method
  • Long-term corrosion
  • Underground infrastructure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Calibrating the impressed anodic current density for accelerated galvanostatic testing to simulate the long-term corrosion behavior of buried pipeline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this