Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in Advanced ALK Inhibitor–Naive ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Second Interim Analysis of the Phase III ALTA-1L Trial

  • D. Ross Camidge
  • , Hye Ryun Kim
  • , Myung Ju Ahn
  • , James C.H. Yang
  • , Ji Youn Han
  • , Maximilian J. Hochmair
  • , Ki Hyeong Lee
  • , Angelo Delmonte
  • , Maria Rosario García Campelo
  • , Dong Wan Kim
  • , Frank Griesinger
  • , Enriqueta Felip
  • , Raffaele Califano
  • , Alexander Spira
  • , Scott N. Gettinger
  • , Marcello Tiseo
  • , Huamao M. Lin
  • , Neeraj Gupta
  • , Michael J. Hanley
  • , Quanhong Ni
  • Pingkuan Zhang, Sanjay Popat
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
  • Yonsei University
  • National Taiwan University
  • National Cancer Center
  • Krankenhaus Nord
  • Chungbuk National University
  • IRCCS Istituto scientifico romagnolo per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Meldola (FC)
  • Hospital Juan Canalejo
  • Seoul National University
  • University of Oldenburg
  • Vall d’Hebron University Hospital
  • University of Manchester
  • Virginia Cancer Specialists and US Oncology Research
  • Yale University
  • University of Parma
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Institute of Cancer Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and improved health-related quality of life (QoL) versus crizotinib in advanced ALK inhibitor–naive ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at first interim analysis (99 events; median brigatinib follow-up, 11.0 months) in the open-label, phase III ALTA-1L trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02737501). We report results of the second prespecified interim analysis (150 events). METHODS Patients with ALK inhibitor–naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-day lead-in at 90 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was PFS as assessed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Investigator-assessed efficacy, blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments, and patient-reported outcomes were also collected. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-five patients were randomly assigned (brigatinib, n 5 137; crizotinib, n 5 138). With median follow-up of 24.9 months for brigatinib (150 PFS events), brigatinib showed consistent superiority in BIRC-assessed PFS versus crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.68]; log-rank P, .0001; median, 24.0 v 11.0 months). Investigator-assessed PFS HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.61; median, 29.4 v 9.2 months). No new safety concerns emerged. Brigatinib delayed median time to worsening of global health status/QoL scores compared with crizotinib (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49 to 1.00]; log-rank P 5 .049). Brigatinib daily area under the plasma concentration–time curve was not a predictor of PFS (HR, 1.005 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.031]; P 5 .69). CONCLUSION Brigatinib represents a once-daily ALK inhibitor with superior efficacy, tolerability, and QoL over crizotinib, making it a promising first-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3592-3603
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume38
Issue number31
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in Advanced ALK Inhibitor–Naive ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Second Interim Analysis of the Phase III ALTA-1L Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this